Funny. Charles Lindbergh’s
ancestors so often seemed to be stubborn, pioneering, energetic and eccentric
loners with a cutting edge/crackpot scientific bent. Are we all that
predictable?
Portrait of Lindy by Pam Glew |
“Raised in virtual isolation among
Lindberghs, Lodges and Lands, it was difficult for Charles Lindbergh ever to
recognize that his kin might have differed from other people,” wrote biographer
A. Scott Berg.
“He was proud that his family tree
abounded with independent thinkers in a broad range of disciplines — most of
which he would pursue. But he never perceived that many of his ancestors were
prideful to the point of arrogance — rebels so far apart from the rest of
society as to be above the law, so evangelical as to appear fanatical, so
global in their vision as to be shortsighted.
“For all his fascination with
detail, Lindbergh never examined his family history close enough to see that it
included financial malfeasance, flight from justice, bigamy, illegitimacy,
melancholia, manic-depression, alcoholism, grievous generational conflicts and
wanton abandonment of families. But those undercurrents were always there.
“And so this third-generation
Lindbergh was born with a deeply private nature and bred according to the
principles of self-reliance — nonconformity and the innate understanding that
greatness came at the inevitable price of being misunderstood.”
Toward the end of his life,
Lindbergh did understand this much about all that: “Life’s values originate in
circumstances over which one has no control,” he said.
Source:
‘Lindbergh’ by A. Scott Berg
No comments:
Post a Comment