Two talents tinged by sadness: Actor Robert Culp... |
By Dan Hagen
Actor Robert Culp and
writer-producer Stephen Cannell both proved adept at injecting fresh life into
tired, formulaic American
television. But that life came at some cost to their own.
Cannell created several hit shows,
including “The Rockford Files,” “The A-Team” and “The Greatest American Hero,”
the 1981 superhero series that
teamed the old pro Culp with young William Katt,
the son of actress Barbara Hale who had starred in the Stephen King film
“Carrie.”
One of the writers on “Hero” was novelist
Patrick Hasburgh, who also worked with Cannell on “The A-Team” and (as
co-creator) on “Hardcastle and McCormick” before creating his own hit series,
“21 Jump Street.”
Hasburgh respected both men
greatly, although not unreservedly.
...And writer/producer Stephen Cannell |
Hasburgh said Culp had the best
timing of any actor he ever worked with. “Bob never missed the jokes, but for
some reason he was relegated to TV. He could have easily been a film and stage
star, and was more talented than most of his peers. But he fell into the TV rut
in the ‘50s and then with ‘I Spy’ in the 60s, and he just couldn’t break out of
it. And it wore on him, I think.
“Bob could be a bear to work with
— an elitist, a real star. And despite sometimes drinking a little too much, he
came to play. But (he) always signaled, and maybe rightly so, that he was above
the material.
Katt and Culp |
“Katt was never his equal, never.
Bob was clearly the more skilled actor, and he put up with Billy, which was a
full-time job. Katt was one of the most unhappy people/actors I have ever
worked with. Bob Culp was a real star, and I was lucky to have worked with him
at the end of his prime.”
Hasburgh said Cannell’s career
path was similar. “There was a time — with ‘Columbo,’ ‘The Rockford Files,’ ‘Tenspeed
and Brownshoe,’ ‘Stone,’ ‘Baretta’ — when no one did prime time TV better than Steve. Right up
until ‘Hero,’ Steve was on his game.”
In a way, ironically, it was ‘The A-Team’ that turned Cannell's head, Hasburgh said. “It was his biggest hit and the worst show he’d ever
done. But he LOVED the fame and attention, and pursued it, I think, as a
priority from then on.
“SJC had little to do with ‘Jump
St.’ beyond that his Production Co. produced it. I was the creative motor on
that show, but Steve was all about fame and profile.”
It’s an assessment Cannell himself
might have agreed with, at least partially. “I went through this period where I
was the new genius,” Cannell told the L.A. Times in 1997. “I mean, people were
carrying me around the lot on a litter. I actually heard the words ‘Stephen
Cannell’ and ‘brilliant’ used in the same sentence. When you’ve been the stupidest
kid in class, that's a pretty appealing thing to hear, and I went through a phase
when I tried to believe it.”
The series boasted one of the most popular TV themes |
“I go from being the stupidest kid
in class to being the biggest success at Universal,” Cannell said. “I'm the
David Kelley of the moment, I’m married to my 8th grade sweetheart,
and we have a wonderful, wonderful life.
“And then one day, my son Derek
dies.”
Cannell’s 15-year-old son died in
1982 at the age of 15, during the run of “Hero,” bizarrely smothered in a giant
sand fortress he was building on the beach.
“Steve felt, maybe, that he had
lost his legacy and he spent the rest of his life trying to tell the world that
he was here,” Hasburgh said. ”On his game, Cannell could rock just about any
script. I don't think Steve wrote books as well as he wrote TV, and toward the end he ended up being more famous than he was busy.
“He had become a character in a
Rockford episode, maybe — a washed-up TV producer who couldn’t get arrested
creatively (as I know that one, too) but one who couldn't leave the spotlight,”
Hasburgh said.
“Steve would deny this if he were
alive, but there was always a kind of insecure loneliness about him. But a
special kind; the kind that rich kids have — the ones with talent, at least.
Steve was a rich kid, a WASP, a conservative, and time sort of passed him by,
creatively — and he was smart enough, down deep, to know it.”
Cannell had an admirer in Culp,
who preceded him in death by mere months. Culp died after falling on a sidewalk
near a park in Los Angeles on March 24, 2010, and Cannell died Sept. 30 of that
year from complications of melanoma.
In 1982, I interviewed Culp for my
friend David Anthony Kraft’s magazine, and asked him about Cannell.
DAN: With “Rockford Files” and
“The Greatest American Hero,” Steve Cannell seems good at putting a twist on a
genre and making it kind of fresh.
ROBERT: What Steve is good at is
taking a light-hearted approach to a genre, if you will, and kind of, as you
say, putting a twist on it that no one else would think of but Steve Cannell.
DAN: Making it sort of seem to fit
reality a little better than genres do ordinarily.
ROBERT: Nowadays, yes. The
suspension of disbelief is the first law of the theater taught to every
dramatist when he’s starting out. If he doesn’t learn it, he’s sunk.
The audience walks up to the box
office and plunks down its five bucks — or $45 or $50 if it’s Broadway — and
walks into the theater and sits down in a seat. The analogy is apt for the
living room, as well, because you are buying commercials that you don’t really
want.
The first thing that has to happen
for that audience is that it must be permitted to suspend disbelief. Because
they know they’re in a theater seat or they know they’re sitting in front of a
colored block in their living room. That’s disbelief, because we’re gonna tell
‘em a story up there that they automatically will say is just a story on a box
or just a bunch of actors on a stage.
So the suspension of disbelief is
the phrase that’s been come up with in the last 300 years, and it’s everything.
To do that nowadays, with the degree of audience sophistication having squared
itself several times since I was a kid, is very, very difficult. And one of the
ways you do it is through, like, double negatives.
The double negative, when you’re
talking in terms of language, yields a positive. The same thing sometimes
occurs in physics and in chemistry. And it certainly yields wonderful results
in the theater. Something that Steve Cannell understands instinctively, I
studied it. I don’t think he ever did.
DAN: How would you apply it to
what he does? Can you give me an example of a double negative in the “Greatest
American Hero?”
ROBERT: Well, here we have the
ridiculous situation of being given this suit by extraterrestrials and sticking
these two absolutely disparate human beings together and, somewhere in that,
the extraterrestrials knew that the chemistry between these two particular
human beings was flawless for what they wanted.
One of them hates the suit —
that’s the negative — but cannot resist when he’s called upon and made to feel
guilty where his patriotism is concerned by a guy who distrusts and dislikes
almost everything in the world except the kid and the suit. That’s the double
negative. You put ‘em together and you get a synergism. Instead of two plus two
equals four, it equals five.
DAN: A lot of little innovations,
too. For example, violating the genre by calling him Ralph instead of giving
him a super-hero name.
ROBERT: That’s another example of
the concept of coming at it sideways, or in a negative sort of way.
DAN: Right. What it would be like
if somebody was actually given a suit like that.
Ralph Hinkley flies (badly) |
ROBERT: Well, imagine this. The
very hook that made the series sell, and made it work for the first year, but
became a detriment in the second year, was that he couldn’t work the suit.
That’s a negative. He kept bashing into walls ...
DAN: Right. You couldn’t do that
forever, though.
ROBERT: You can’t do that forever
because the audience got down on it! I mean, you have no idea of the mail and
the talk on the streets. “When is somebody gonna teach that asshole to fly that
suit?” We all knew that it was going to come to a swift end, and it did.
And pretty soon, what we did in
the second year was start to accelerate his ability to find uses for the suit
and to make it work. And by the time we got to the third year, we didn’t expect
too many crashes and too many screamings and falling out of the sky. Only a
few.
DAN: How would you compare it to
the other superhero series on the air? I would say more sophisticated than all
of them. Although “The Incredible Hulk” was okay, I thought.
ROBERT: “The Hulk” was again
another example of the negativeness that I’m talking about, which is silly, but
yields the kind of comedy that we were doing that nobody else on television was
doing - outside of maybe “Saturday Night Live.”
DAN: Except that yours had a twist
of humanism. “Saturday Night Live” always seems pretty harsh and negative to
me.
ROBERT: Harsh and negative, yes. Both
of those things. But we didn’t want to be that, because the essential thing
that made the show work was, underneath it all, a kind of sweetness — a core of
sweetness in Ralph that his fiance, and later his wife, could identify. And
there was also a core of that in Maxwell that Maxwell would deny ‘till his
dying breath.
Sources: Patrick Hasburgh; David
Anthony Kraft’s Comics Interview; “Banging Out a New Ending’ by Bruce Newman,
Los Angeles Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment