I graduated from state university in 1977 with a student loan debt of slightly less than $500. Of course, that was when we all agreed that it was useful, even imperative, for members of an advanced, civilized society to have easy access to higher education.
That was before we decided to chuck all that and just let predatory Wall Street banks make a lifelong meal out of American students.
So why does the Washington Post Editorial Board choose to IGNORE that last point? I think you know.
The Post whines about Biden's student debt relief. You know what really takes money from that "broad tax base" that the Washington Post Editorial Board has suddenly discovered? The military-industrial complex squandering $1.7 trillion on some lame fighter jet.
Student debt relief, on the other hand, provides a cascade of social benefits both immediate and long-term. Do you think any of those people who didn’t go to college sell goods and services that those whose debt has been eased will now, for the first time, be able to AFFORD?
I presume, btw, that the Editorial Board includes a walrus and a carpenter.