By Dan Hagen
Running my eye along my bookshelf of biographies, I am
struck by how many of these people accomplished significant things in the broad
world while pretty much being shits in their immediate world.
Charles Schulz, Dorothy Parker, Alan Watts, Ayn Rand, Ernest
Hemingway, Lillian Hellman — none of them made it easy on their friends, or
even on themselves. All are best appreciated at a distance in time and space. They
aren’t people with whom one could be comfortably involved.
What’s that all about? Does stellar accomplishment in one’s
art or career require so much drive that it distorts the personality, drains it
of some of the energy and empathy necessary for day-to-day decency? That’s another
price that has to be paid for greatness, maybe. The great run up quite a bill.
But happily, some seem to avoid the charge. That shelf also
displays the biographies of people I would have liked to befriend.
There’s Julia Child, a genuinely loving woman who understood
that expert cooking is a way of nurturing and protecting the most intimate of human
relationships on the most ineffable, elemental level.
There’s David Hockney, the visual artist whose talent never
seems to run dry because he constantly replenishes it from the well of
childhood wonder and play that he has carried with him into advanced age.
There’s Daniel Boone, who was mystified at his transformation
into a mythic frontier hero during his own lifetime and horrified at being
ballyhooed as an unstoppable “Indian fighter.”
“I never kilt but three,” Boone said plaintively, guiltily.
And there was Dashiell Hammett, the essential author of the
hardboiled American private detective story, once a hardboiled American private
detective himself and yet a man of deep social conscience who gave away his
considerable earnings to people in need about as fast as the checks came in.
Despite his crippling alcoholism, I’d have loved to know the
man. Hammett was a genuine stoic, a man who could go to prison for his convictions
without complaint.
Hammett has one of his protagonists say, “I can stand
whatever I’ve got to stand.” That sounded like fiction, but it wasn’t.
Incidental Intelligence:
Phyllis Nastri-Nelson: Thank goodness there are so many
artistic & creative ways for great minds to have worked out some of their
angst — albeit messing up personal relationships in the process.
Incidental Intelligence:
I asked my friends to chime in on this topic. Here’s some of
what they said:
Lynne Parker: I think it just shows that the arts are
peppered with assholes the same as the rest of the population.
Dan Hagen: Yet I would have thought better of people of deep
understanding.
Lynne Parker: That is confusing intellect and emotion. I'm
inclined to believe the greater the understanding or intellect the more outraged
a person may be. Far from being one of the media benumbed sheep, they know what
is going on. I can't help but think of my own brother as well. He has
Asperger's Syndrome, a mild form of autism. He was bullied during his school
years and continues to house a deep rage over it. He is, however, one of the
most intelligent people I know. Far smarter than I am.
Aren't most very intelligent or creative people a
"little off"? Society treats such people poorly until everyone agrees
on that person's worth. Then they are treated as celebrities.
Patricia Poulter: As always, thought-provoking. Perhaps it
is that some people, in focusing on the broad human condition, become myopic
with regard to the beauty and necessity of genuine human(e) interaction.
Michael Jones: I often think that walking around with that
kind of demanding, consuming genius inside tends to make 'victims' a little
antisocial, impatient, otherworldly and obsessive. NOT a good combination for
those who would live in peaceful, mutually considerate relationships with them.
Look at Picasso. Beethoven. The more intense the genius, the more difficult to
be a human.
Thommy Berlin: Oh I think I'd have enjoyed getting drunk
with all of them. NONE of us are perfect.
Hell, You could launch a Saturn 5 at perfect from here and
fall short, lol.
I've had the good luck to meet several of my 'heroes' (all
musical) and by and large was very favorably impressed.
Our Mr. Hagen here (who I have never met), is impressive.
So there you go.
The inability to focus on anything beyond themselves.
I find only one thing repellent in humans:
Michelle Mueller Teheux: Can all of us just blame all our
faults on our genius?
Sam Lisuzzo: In years gone by genius expressing bad behavior
often seemed to have a special societal privilege and were often forgiven. I
think of Jackson Pollock, Judy Garland, Montgomery Clift, Eugene O'Neal or
Arthur Rimbaud. Today there is advanced cognitive therapy, numerous forms of
meditation and "Rehab.” I don't think in today's society genius and
chronic dysfunction need necessarily be tantamount to each other. As you love
Hammett, I love his soul-mate, Lillian Hellman.....
Dan Hagen: She was a handful, though. I did became a close
friend/protégé to one of my great heroes — the novelist Elleston Trevor/Adam
Hall — and he was everything I expected him to be, and more. No clay on those
well-shod Brit feet.
Sam Lisuzzo: Hellman was a handful... A year or so ago I
sat at a dinner for two hours with Van Cliburn. He was quite the gentleman I'm
happy to report. We had great fun.
Tom Key: I am surrounded by "handfuls" who are not
likely to be known to history. I'm going to tell them to step it up.
Phyllis Nastri-Nelson: Yes, I would say that in my experience
(both live & from books) most genuinely creative people are high
maintenance. If by chance they are also mentally stable, then they might also
be emotionally intelligent - which makes for quite a unique human being indeed!
I met a few of each in my life.
Michelle Mueller Teheux: Another reason newsrooms tend to be
very interesting places to work ... Lots of creative weird people not concerned
about social norms. Not always geniuses, but usually quite thoughtful.
Dan Hagen: I'm starting to think that greatness may be
overrated.
Sam Lisuzzo: I love Virginia Woolf. She committed suicide
probably because she was having a difficult change of life. I find her death a
great tragedy. Perhaps if she'd had resources that are available today, the
greatest female writer ever might have enjoyed a longer life. It hurts me today
that she took rocks and put them in her pockets to ensure her total demise. The
sadness and loneliness she experienced is unspeakable. Damn it, I'd have liked
a better end for such a great lady!
No comments:
Post a Comment