Given the fact that the First Amendment already fully
protects the exercise of religion in this nation, exactly what “religious
freedoms” are crying out to be “restored?” The proponents of the Indiana law
fall silent on that point — and well they should — because majority religion
Christians are not oppressed or even inconvenienced at any place or any time in
this country. What they don’t dare say is that the intent of the law, the
practical effect of the law, is to embolden fundamentalist Christians to exercise
their bigotry in denying American citizens public accommodations. And that’s
hatred (rhymes with “sacred”).
No comments:
Post a Comment