When Albert Einstein took a stand against Sen. Joseph
McCarthy’s anticommunist witch hunt in 1953, he advised that American intellectuals
should refuse to testify before McCarthy’s committee on the grounds that they
were defending the free expression principles of the First Amendment to the
Bill of Rights.
Russell and Einstein |
America’s newspapers, the beneficiaries of the First
Amendment, promptly and stridently denounced him. Anti-Einstein screeds
appeared on the editorial pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post, the
Chicago Tribune, the Philadelphia Inquirer and others.
Einstein had sparked the firestorm by making public a reply
he had given to a Brooklyn schoolteacher who had refused to cooperate with
McCarthy’s hysterical inquisition into supposed “communist influence in high
schools.”
“The problem with which the intellectuals of this country
are confronted is very serious,” Einstein told him. “The reactionary
politicians have managed to instill suspicion of all intellectual efforts into
the public by dangling before their eyes a danger from without . . . They are
now proceeding to suppress the freedom of teaching and to deprive of their
positions all those who do not prove submissive…
“What ought the minority of intellectuals to do against this
evil? I can only see the revolutionary way of non-co-operation, in Gandhi’s
sense... based on the assertion that it is shameful for a blameless citizen to
submit to such an inquisition…
“If enough people are ready to take this grave step they
will be successful. If not, then the intellectuals of this country deserve
nothing better than the slavery which is intended for them.”
Seeing all the vitriol hurled against the venerable, kindly Einstein,
the British philosopher Bertrand Russell penned a wry reply to the New York
Times.
“You seem to think one should always obey the law, however bad,” the philosopher wrote. “I am compelled to suppose that you condemn George Washington and hold that your country ought to return to allegiance to Her Gracious Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II. As a loyal Briton, I of course applaud this view, but I fear it may not win much support in your country.”
“You seem to think one should always obey the law, however bad,” the philosopher wrote. “I am compelled to suppose that you condemn George Washington and hold that your country ought to return to allegiance to Her Gracious Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II. As a loyal Briton, I of course applaud this view, but I fear it may not win much support in your country.”
Source: “Einstein: His Life and Universe” by Walter Isaacson
No comments:
Post a Comment