By Dan Hagen
An Illinois boy, I’ve been bored by the deification of
Abraham Lincoln, that mushy, rotten-apple worship that has prompted thousands of books about
him and seems to have subtly tainted every screen portrayal of the man.
Daniel Day-Lewis as the martyred 16th president |
I always smelled a rodent there. Men who become symbols also
become the vehicle for somebody else’s agenda.
Besides, if Lincoln was a humble, woodsy rail-splitter grown
to godhood, then his emancipation of a people was no trick at all, right?
Freeing whole peoples is what gods do. It would seem to be one of their hobbies.
But Daniel Day-Lewis, in Stephen Spielberg’s Lincoln, is no god. Noble, long-suffering,
yes, but always human, pressed to perform a task that seems just about humanly impossible
— the moral elevation of a society determined to resist it.
What Day-Lewis seems to be is not a deity but — and I’m
reluctant to gush in this way — President Lincoln.
Sitting between Paul Beals and Matt Mattingly, I felt more
than once that I was actually seeing
Lincoln, and choked up more than once, too, hearing similar soft gurgles from
either side.
In this definitive performance, Day-Lewis’ reedy voice
pleads and ponders, cajoles and compels, finally rising, when he is
sufficiently provoked, to ringing moral imperative. His eyes twinkle, light
with sly insight, deepen to reflect the still waters of compassion, and finally
grow opaque to hint at the operation of a genius just beyond our reach.
Day-Lewis uses Lincoln’s homespun shaggy-dog humor to woo others, to relieve
Lincoln’s own considerable tensions but also, I think, as a trick to blind
people to the operation of an intelligence they might otherwise fear.
Day-Lewis sometimes moves — for example, while embracing his
boy Tad or clapping a friend on the knee — with a matter-of-fact openness that
suggests a man who understands love and thirsts for it. A single deft scene —
in which Lincoln compliments his father’s insight while ruefully hinting that
they loathed each other — suggests a source for that thirst.
Daniel Day-Lewis, beleaguered but "clothed in immense power." |
And what playthings this play has provided for these distinguished
professionals. Tony Kushner’s dialogue has the bracing, emphatic clarity of
lightning cutting right across an ominous, roiling sky. It is Chayefsky-like, romantic,
far-sighted, swiftly intelligent, elevated in tone and concern.
These are articulate
Americans — not indifferent to education, as we are now, but determined to use
their hard-won eloquence in the service of the greatest moral crisis in the nation’s history. The fact that they know what’s at stake — the end or the
perpetuation of nothing less than human enslavement — lends their political
struggles a thriller-like desperation, played out against a backdrop of wartime
personal problems that might paralyze others. Mere ticking time bombs seem ho-hum
by comparison.
No one is going to walk out of that theatre muttering the familiar cynical cheap shot that the Civil War “wasn’t about slavery,” or that
slavery’s finish was accidental or inevitable — not after seeing the chess-like
ingenuity, deft deceptions, philosophical clarity, emotional exhaustion and
sheer courageous cussedness that these characters must deploy to get the job,
finally and forever, done.
As the film ended, the packed-house
audience, knowing the actors couldn’t hear them, applauded them anyway.
---
Nov. 26, 2012, update. I saw "Lincoln" again yesterday afternoon, and it was if anything more powerful the second time around.
I think this movie will live, and perhaps counterbalance "Gone With the Wind" as the overriding popular culture image of the Civil War.
Yesterday I could stop talking in my Day-Lewis Lincoln voice. I never saw the like of it. Never saw the like.
---
Nov. 26, 2012, update. I saw "Lincoln" again yesterday afternoon, and it was if anything more powerful the second time around.
I think this movie will live, and perhaps counterbalance "Gone With the Wind" as the overriding popular culture image of the Civil War.
Yesterday I could stop talking in my Day-Lewis Lincoln voice. I never saw the like of it. Never saw the like.
Not exactly sure why, but this review actually makes me a bit emotional, too. Perhaps it is the fact that, some 150 years later, I have no idea which direction our nation would go if "the slavery issue" were still an issue. Are our own moral compasses, now, any better than they were during Lincoln's time? I'm not sure.
ReplyDeleteI think that sentiment is exactly part of what makes the film so moving, Di.
ReplyDeleteDan, your review put into words what I could not. I have ordered my son, who usually avoids films with historical content, to see this movie (with threats of disinheritance.) It is to my embarrassment,considering I've always been interested in US history, that I was unaware of how resistant to true freedom the Northern states were during this period. This is such an important film.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Kevin. I think the film does put paid to all those nasty, bullshit arguments that "it wasn't really about slavery" or "slavery would have vanished anyway." Slavery, in fact, still exists in this country. We just call in the privatized prison system of corporate labor now.
ReplyDelete