Pages

Sunday, May 19, 2013

The Mystery of the Menacing Mirror Men



“The only service a friend can really render is to keep up your courage by holding up to you a mirror in which you can see a noble image of yourself.”
— George Bernard Shaw


        By Dan Hagen
A riddle worthy of the Batman.
From childhood on, I understood with a boy’s instincts why superheroes had to have colorful costumes, dual identities, spectacular powers, formidable foes, fast and fabulous vehicles, even Fortresses of Solitude and Bottled Cities of Kandor (think tree houses and ant farms writ large).
Only two conventions persistently puzzled me — why these perfectly self-contained superheroes bothered with girlfriends, and why they seemed to be constantly confronted by their doubles.
The girlfriend thing eventuall­­­­y resolved itself, but the seemingly weird obsession with doubles continued to puzzle me.
The theme of doubling was especially prevalent in the comics. The double was built right into the concept of most superheroes in the form of the secret identity or “alter ego.” Superman and Clark Kent, Batman and Bruce Wayne, Peter Parker and Spider-Man, always the two who were one.
And then there were the arch-enemies, who always turned out to be, in one way or another, funhouse mirror dark doubles of the hero.
Thus, Lex Luthor is an evil intellectual superman opposed by a heroic physical Superman. The Joker is a cackling costumed sociopath opposed by a grim costumed crime fighter. Dr. Octopus is a mature, many-limbed creature-themed villain opposed by a teenaged hero whose costume suggests a creature with many limbs.
The Thing battles the Thing.
The heroic magician Dr. Strange saves us from the evil magician Baron Mordo, and both were students of the Ancient One. The heroic Norse god Thor shields us from the evil Norse god Loki, and so forth.
Not only the heroes’ enemies but also their allies often mirrored them. Early on, Batman acquired a Robin and Captain Marvel was assisted by Captain Marvel Jr., Mary Marvel, various Lieutenants Marvel and whatnot. Superman was echoed in Superboy (literally his younger self) and then in Krypto the Superdog and Supergirl, while Batman met Ace the Bathound, Batwoman, Bat-Girl and Batgirl (two different girls, don’t ask). Hawkgirl, Spider-Woman, the She-Hulk, the Bionic Woman, the Greatest American Heroine, the list is inexhaustible.
The mirror-nature of the archenemies and the alter ego and the sidekicks is obvious, but the comic books didn’t leave the double theme there. They underlined it repeatedly and directly with robot doubles, mirror creatures, clones and various other dopplegangers.
Thus Superman faced any number of literal duplicates, the most prominent of whom was Bizarro. Batman, with his Batmobile and Batplane and Bat Signal, fought Killer Moth, with his Mothmobile and Mothplane and Moth Signal.
Wonder Woman battles the villainous Super Woman
The Incredible Hulk battled his equally incredible duplicate gamma-ray monster the Abomination. Spider-Man fought the evil spider guy Venom, who in turn spawned the evil spider guy Carnage. Green Lantern stood against the renegade Green Lantern Corps member Sinestro. The Flash raced against Reverse Flash. The armored capitalist Iron Man dueled the armored communists Crimson Dynamo and Titanium Man.
So why were all these doubles redoubled? The answer has deep roots, I think.
Critic Mark Schorer noted that the Gothic tradition, or what Nathaniel Hawthorne would have called the romance tradition, refers to “...stories that are set in a world where we continually move without transition or warning from the actual into the dream, from the real into the surreal, from the natural into the supernatural.”
That’s a description that neatly fits the comic book superhero stories, which shift constantly from mundane and recognizable urban reality to nightmarish mythological battle zones and back again.
“They are stories whose central concern is with the theme of the Doppleganger, the alter ego, and the supernatural is, in fact, symbolic of the world in which that other self, which we cannot ever confront in the busy social world, exists.
“These are stories generally about lonely, loveless people — or, at any rate, they seem to be lonely because they are loveless — who encounter strange, often offensive creatures with whom they are, in one way or another, trapped and whom they cannot and usually do not wish to escape, for these creatures are their selves, their fate, whom they are helpless to shun." 
Deepak and Gotham Chopra, in their book “The Seven Spiritual Laws of Superheroes,” note that the doubling theme can explore the Jungian Shadow or dark side of the personality.
“At one point a dark symbiote latches onto the heroic Spider-Man. The shadow being brings out Spider-Man’s darker impulses, making him arrogant, vengeful and selfish. His iconic red and blue suit even turns black as he literally takes on a shadowy persona. But eventually Spider-Man, through his own awareness, is able to resist these shadow qualities and sheds the symbiote. It then occupies another being and becomes one of Spider-Man's archenemies, known as Venom, forever stalking him and reminding the great superhero of what he could become if he were to give in to his own shadow self.”
So it’s all a metaphor, unconscious but existentially valid. As we journey though life, those of us who are paying attention can’t help but notice that the greatest constraints are invariably those we place on ourselves.
We wonderful creatures, so noble and daring in our dreams, are self-shackled, self-disappointing. Our most persistent recurring foe, the archenemy of our splendid ideals and aspirations, is always the self.
"A man may conquer a million men in battle, but one who conquers himself is, indeed, the greatest of conquerors."
— The Dhammapada

Sources: Introduction to “Selected Writing of Truman Capote,” Modern Library.




This collage by Hugh Fox.

6 comments:

  1. You do have a fantastic point. But my question is this: Superheroes have the ability to actually do battle with their personified other half — is that why we read their stories? Is it that we have a need to see someone actually overcome their inner demons because we often lack the ability to do so ourselves?

    Just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good question, Zach. I think these superhero stories, like other myths, probably externalize and make concrete and visible conflicts and dramas that are common to the inner life of humans. The great mythology scholar Joseph Campbell explored much of this. Here 's a link:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYg67hJu4Qg

    ReplyDelete
  3. "'There is another world and it is in this one. " Paul Éluard

    i loved this dan. the duality of nature and the macrocosm representing the microcosm, has always been my main attraction to myth, epic art and the natural progression of all these things...the superhero comic book. so beautifully put.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting,but like all analysis,it is only partly true.There are other equally worthy explanations.For example,I found myself thinking of Chilly Willie,the cold hating penguin the other day.Can't say why,I just was reminded.Was this an example of a deep exploration of our tendencies to never be satisfied? Or is it just a cute gimmick? Both I guess. Cute gimmick more than anything.I think the same is true here.Some stories,like Spiderman/Venom or Green Lantern/Sinestro are obviously built upon deeper themes,but others are probably just gimmicks.Nothing wrong with a good,fun,gimmick.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As Ken Davis said elsewhere, "I think, perhaps, in the simplified stories a reader can see a complete persona, a total aspect that addresses all parts of a individual psychology. All aspects, from success and failure in life, and the gamut of emotions fully writ to allow a reader to live vicariously ( or at least associate somewhat) with the triumphs and turmoil they read within.
    "It lets them explore their rages, their lusts, their frustrations and wistful hopes in a metaphorical sense, and via avatars. They can internalize instead of acting out, and it is safer for the self that way, because there's almost no external criticism that way."

    ReplyDelete