Pages
▼
Sunday, December 24, 2017
Wednesday, December 20, 2017
Monday, December 18, 2017
The Alternative to American Materialism
Americans seem to assume that the
alternative to materialism is poverty. I find that ironic because it’s clear to
me that the necessary result of materialism is emotional and mental
impoverishment.
So the alternative to materialism
isn’t poverty. The alternative to materialism is an indifference to wealth that
may well provide a relative immunity to greed.
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
Monday, December 11, 2017
Thus Is History Whored Out
On the July 8, 2009, Fox & Friends during a discussion of
a Swedish study showing that married people are less likely to get Alzheimer’s,
this Fox News sage said that Americans don’t have “pure genes” like Swedes
because “…we keep marrying other species and other ethnics.”
Specifically, Kilmeade said,
“Swedes have pure genes, because they marry other Swedes, because that’s the
rule. Finland — Finns marry other Finns, so they have a pure society. In
America, we marry everybody. So we’ll marry Italians and Irish.”
However, I doubt that Kilmeade
included such insights in his Islamophobic propaganda “history” — not only
because he didn’t write it, but because he probably can’t even read it.
Sunday, December 10, 2017
Saturday, December 9, 2017
Democrats Stab Themselves in the Back
Now watch as the GOP carefully
selects a fresh list of prominent Democrats to destroy with more unverified
and/or easily fabricated accusations. The Republicans must be licking their
lips, in between the bouts of laughter.
Where did any Democrat get the
truly laughable idea that Republicans will now somehow respect their
"moral authority?" What Republicans respect is POWER, and the witch
hunter Democrats have just handed them more of it.
We’ve silenced a major progressive
voice, leaving a sex criminal in the Oval Office and a child molester about to
be seated in the Senate. Yes, women can certainly sing hosannas now.
The Democrats will only need a
cigarette now when the Republicans line them up against the wall. They're
already wearing the blindfold.
Friday, December 8, 2017
Monday, December 4, 2017
Monday, November 27, 2017
When I Taught Journalism...
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Sunday, November 12, 2017
The Gay Life of Sherlock Holmes
Colin Blakely as John Watson and Robert Stephens as Sherlock Holmes in Billy Wilder's film |
Concerning on the commercial
failure of his 1970 film The Private Life
of Sherlock Holmes, director Billy Wilder said, “I should have been more
daring. I wanted to make Holmes a homosexual … That’s why he’s on dope, you
know.”
I first saw it at a drive-in in
1970. It was hard to find. And it was always pretty clear to me from the
finished film that Wilder DID make Holmes gay. Despite all the romantic stuff
with the beautiful German spy at the end of the film, its most sadly touching
moment comes earlier, when Holmes refuses to deny to Watson that he is
homosexual.
The doggedly heterosexual, brainy,
manic Wilder loved Holmes, and had wanted to make a film about him for his
entire career. But perhaps audiences were not ready, in 1970, to see a film in
which the Great Detective is both taken seriously and finally defeated.
“Holmes appeals to Wilder for his
human failings more than for his legendary qualities as a detective — The Private Life depicts a crushing
humiliation which Dr. Watson has suppressed from public knowledge,” Joseph
McBride and Michael Wilmington wrote in Film
Quarterly. “But Wilder’s tone is unusually subdued, even elegiac, perhaps
because the film is set in a simpler, more gentlemanly era far from the
barbarism of James Bond and Pussy Galore.”
I’d be fascinated to see the
three-and-a-half-hour Private Life that
Wilder originally prepared, but wasn’t permitted to release. I always have the
nagging sense that even Wilder’s failed concepts were just slightly ahead of
their time. The possibility that Holmes and Watson might be gay finally became
a mere running joke in the BCC’s Sherlock.
Elementary, Wilder would’ve said.
Sunday, November 5, 2017
Thor Ragnarok: Blood and Thunder and Fun
Paul, Matt, Jake and I saw Thor:
Ragnarok Saturday afternoon. Lighthearted fare that builds seamlessly to
blood-and-thunder, summon-my-power melodrama. In other words, a perfectly
satisfying comic book movie.
Cate Blanchette tackles the
potentially tedious role of a death god with wry assurance peppered by
convincing menace. Chris Hemsworth is as boldly charming as ever, even being
put through some rough paces here.
Now, having so many characters to
play around with after 17 Marvel superhero movies, it’s all like a delightful
game with lots of surprising and fun playing pieces.
I do have to say that they pitched
Jane Foster overboard like trash in this movie. Not that they ever really
achieved that Richard Donner Superman/Lois thing they were going for in that
relationship anyway. I think Natalie Portman was the problem. They needed
someone who would sell it the way Margot Kidder did. Kidder said that what
Donner wanted of her was to be able to convincingly look gah-gah over Superman.
The first Thor movie ends on a
wonderfully romantic note that would have been perfect had you believed the
relationship.
Saturday, November 4, 2017
Reading and Plotting and Writing
My favorite books as a teenager
included Plotting and Writing Suspense
Fiction by Patricia Highsmith. The canny creator of The Talented Mr. Ripley wrote a book that is equal parts
inspirational, autobiographical and advisory.
I read an Effingham library copy
when I was in high school and it took me decades to find a hardcover copy of my
own. She made me want to be a professional writer.
Other favorites included The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. I have since
escaped their dark, Neptune-like gravitational pull, but I will never forget
them. Rand’s philosophy offers useful hymns to individualism — particularly for
the young, when they most need to hear them. But unfortunately, despite her
self-congratulatory trumpeting of reason, Rand confused her own whims and
passions with facts, much to the detriment of the political economy and moral
bearings of the U.S., as it turned out.
Then there was Live and Let Die by Ian Fleming. The
second of the James Bond novels remains the most vivid in my mind, with its
evocation of New York circa 1953, with its tough heroic action, with its
vulnerable, clairvoyant heroine, with its Freudian-daddy villain’s horrifying
schemes of vengeance, with its lyric Silver Meteor train ride from Manhattan to
St. Petersburg and those offhanded observations of Bond’s that seemed to
express the height of sophistication when you were a teenage boy.
The problem isn’t getting the
caviar you want, you know. It’s getting the proper amount of buttered toast to
spread it on.
Ian Fleming took an eager
sensual pleasure in life that ended his life early, but that can still sweep us
along with its zest. The real Bond — as real as any Bond can be — is there, in
Fleming’s novels.
Friday, November 3, 2017
Monday, October 23, 2017
Sunday, October 8, 2017
Saturday, October 7, 2017
Miss Stellwagon Scores a Point
In the 1948 film comedy Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House, Cary Grant’s teenage daughters lecture him
that their teacher, Miss Stellwagon, has informed them that advertising is a
basically parasitic profession that encourages people to want things they don’t
need and can’t afford.
Throughout the movie, Grant’s
lucrative Madison Avenue job is in peril because he can’t think of a good
slogan for a product called Wham. Finally he comes up with the perfect slogan —
by stealing it from his black maid.
I call that a point for Miss
Stellwagon.
Cary Grant, Myrna Loy and Melvyn Douglas in "Mr. Blandings" |
“Mr. Blandings never seems to have
any work to do, apart from thinking up a catchy slogan for Wham, and he has six
months to do that in from the time when he finds out that the account has
devolved on him,” noted James Bowman of the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
“For this, the agency pays him $15,000 a year, or the equivalent of between
$250,000 and $350,000 today, depending on the equivalency measure you choose.
And when he finally does stumble on a slogan, it isn’t even his but that of
Gussie, the maid, played as a now cringe-inducing stereotype by Louise Beavers.
Rather like the gold-seekers in Treasure
of the Sierra Madre, the advertising business seems rather buccaneering.
Finders keepers and tough luck Gussie, who makes a final appearance in an
exaggerated chef's toque and presenting an enormous platter full of Wham above
the slogan: ‘If you ain't eatin' Wham, you ain't eatin’ ham’ — a patent
falsehood to rank with ‘If you can't sleep at night, it isn't the coffee, it's
the bunk.’
“Yet neither question — that of
the slogan’s rightful owner or its truthfulness — ever arises in the movie. Its
concern isn't with how Jim gets his money but with how he’s going to spend it.”
I can’t help thinking Americans were
a lot smarter in 1948 than we are in 2017.
Tuesday, October 3, 2017
Sweet Land of Lottery, Of Thee We Sing
I am particularly fascinated by the
revulsion with which many readers of the New Yorker greeted Shirley Jackson’s
short story The Lottery when it
appeared in the June 26, 1948, issue.
“One of the most terrifying aspects
of publishing stories and books is the realization that they are going to be
read, and read by strangers,” Jackson wrote later. “I had never fully realized
this before, although I had of course in my imagination dwelt lovingly upon the
thought of the millions and millions of people who were going to be uplifted
and enriched and delighted by the stories I wrote.
“It had simply never occurred to
me that these millions and millions of people might be so far from being
uplifted that they would sit down and write me letters I was downright scared
to open; of the 300-odd letters that I received that summer I can count only 13
that spoke kindly to me, and they were mostly from friends. Even my mother
scolded me.”
The readers seemed unpleasantly
surprised, as if Jackson’s fantasy tale were some big, hard stone thrown by one
of the residents of Jackson’s pious and traditional American town.
People who choose to wear blinders
often get blind-sided, I suppose.
It can smart, even today, when you
suddenly realize that behind the ringing Madison Avenue slogan of “Liberty And
Justice For All” lies the ritualized shooting of unarmed black men by America’s
anointed agents.
Rereading the story last May, I
realized how aptly it anticipated Donald Trump’s America — happy small-town families selecting
innocent people to torture to death in a ritual that serves their
self-satisfied, never-to-be-questioned tribal traditions and vanities. Then, no
doubt, they do a little shopping and argue about dinner.
“‘The Lottery’ takes the classic
theme of man’s inhumanity to man and gives it an additional twist: the randomness
inherent in brutality,” wrote New Yorker writer Ruth Franklin in a 2013
retrospective. “It anticipates the way we would come to understand the 20th
century’s unique lessons about the capacity of ordinary citizens to do evil — from
the Nazi camp bureaucracy, to the Communist societies that depended on the
betrayal of neighbor by neighbor and the experiments by the psychologists
Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo demonstrating how little is required to
induce strangers to turn against each other.
“In 1948, with the fresh horrors
of the Second World War barely receding into memory and the Red Scare just
beginning, it is no wonder that the story’s first readers reacted so vehemently
to this ugly glimpse of their own faces in the mirror, even if they did not
realize exactly what they were looking at.”
And although she died in 1965, I
don’t think 21st century America would surprise Jackson much. She described the tone of the first
letters she received as “…a kind of wide-eyed, shocked innocence. People at
first were not so much concerned with what the story meant; what they wanted to
know was where these lotteries were held, and whether they could go there and
watch.”
Monday, October 2, 2017
To Live and Die in Las Vegas
The crowd flees in terror as a sniper mows them down at a Las Vegas concert. |
When I heard early this morning that some sniper
named Stephen Paddock had shot 50 people to death at an open-air concert in
Vegas and wounded another 200, I was sure of only one thing: that Fox News would
already be huddled somewhere with the NRA, carefully crafting lies to broadcast
about the gun massacre.
I turned to CBS News, and watched the talking heads discussing
regulations to prevent such American mass shootings.
HOTEL regulations, of course.
I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.
A child shoots up a local high school. A
gun-worshipping politician returns to Congress after being gunned down while
playing baseball. Some sniper gets himself all cozy on the 32nd floor,
killing 50 people and wounds another 200 at a country music concert.
Why, there’s nothing to see here, folks! Just
another typical week in America. None of this has anything to do with GUNS,
certainly!
The NRA will assure us, as it always does, that more
guns will solve the problem. But gee, it’s kind of hard to shoot back at a
sniper on the 32nd floor, isn’t it? Maybe the NRA will suggest all Americans
need concealed carry shoulder-fired rocket launchers now.
The timid, sold-out corporate media reporters can actually
look at the hundreds of people screaming and running and pissing their pants in
Vegas, and then dare tell us this isn't “terrorism.” Of course it’s terrorism. It’s NRA terrorism.
The NRA wants us to get accustomed to American mass
shootings with unlimited numbers of victims. Forget about it, treat it as
routine, file it on the back page with boil orders and bake sales. No amount of
slaughter, even if it’s dozens of children having their brains blown out, will
ever be enough to justify the least interference with their gun rites.
Not rights.
“Rites.”
But never fear, Congress is sure to address the Las
Vegas sniper massacre soon — by legalizing silencers.
And by next week, some Republican will gunsplain to
me, with great confidence, how the Las Vegas sniper massacre was nothing but a
hoax.
Tuesday, September 26, 2017
Life Here in Trumpistan
Firing squads, concentration camps
and "reeducation centers" featuring torture. We all know where
Trump's ship of state is headed, if we don't seize the wheel and change its
course.
Friday, September 22, 2017
Look What I Found at Dollar Tree Today
Thursday, September 21, 2017
The Handbag That Saved President Roosevelt
The president-elect speaking in Miami in 1933, just before the assassination attempt. |
In 1933, mired in the economic
quicksand of the Great Depression, a 32-year-old unemployed Italian bricklayer
named Giuseppe “Joe” Zangara bought a .32 caliber US Revolver Company handgun
for $8 at a Miami pawn shop, intending to assassinate President-elect Franklin
D. Roosevelt.
Zangara said he had nothing
against FDR personally, but just wanted to murder a rich person.
On Feb. 15, the yacht on which FDR
had been sailing docked at Miami, and he hurried to address the American Legion
encampment there.
As Roosevelt sat in his car
chatting with Chicago Mayor Anton “Tony” Cermak, Zangara fired five shots from
no more than 40 feet away. He missed Roosevelt, who sat unflinching with his
jaw clenched. Luckily, a doctor’s wife who was in the crowd, Lillian Cross, had
struck Zangara’s arm with her handbag just as he fired.
“The first shot he fired was so
close to my face I got powder burns from it,” Cross said. She and other
horrified spectators dragged him to the ground.
But the damage was done. Five
people were shot, including a Secret Service agent and a woman named Mabel
Gill, who was fatally wounded. So was the Chicago mayor.
“The chauffeur started the car,”
FDR recalled. “I looked around and saw Mayor Cermak doubled up …. I called to
the chauffeur to stop. He did, about 15 feet from where we started. The Secret
Service man shouted to him to get out of the crowd and he started forward
again. I stopped him a second time (and) motioned to have (Cermak) put in the
back of the car, which would be first out.”
On the way to the hospital, FDR
held Cermak and tried to keep him still, saying, “Tony, keep quiet — don’t
move. It won’t hurt if you keep quiet.”
Raymond Moley, a Colombia
political science professor and aide to Roosevelt, watched FDR carefully that
day for a reaction to the death and danger. “There was nothing,” he said. “Not
so much as the twitching of a muscle to indicate that it wasn’t any other
evening in any other place. Roosevelt was simply himself — easy, confident,
poised, to all appearances.”
FDR’s courage in the face of an
assassination attempt went some distance toward reassuring the frightened,
ailing nation about the man who would be president.
Defiant to the end, Zangara was
quickly tried and executed, but he lives on in musicals like Stephen Sondheim’s
Assassins and stories like Philip K.
Dick’s The Man in the High Castle. In
Dick’s novel, Zangara succeeds in murdering FDR, and the Axis powers win World
War II.
This is just the kind of historic
account that brings a tear to the eyes of NRA members, reminding them of their
wistful longing for the good old days when you could buy a handgun for only
eight bucks.
Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Saturday, September 16, 2017
Take a Look at a Real Hero
One tin soldier rides away. |
And think how many American and Vietnamese lives would have
be saved if any of America's leaders had paid attention to Ali.
Friday, September 15, 2017
Fight White Terrorism
Monday, September 11, 2017
Pathetic GOP Lies, Part 7,645,304,756,737
Saturday, September 9, 2017
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
Wednesday, August 30, 2017
Beware the Big Lies of the GOP
The absurd claim by some
Republicans that Obama was president during Hurricane Katrina is NOT merely
stupidity. It’s a calculated fascist Big Lie meant to confuse low-information
voters.
The GOP regularly tries such Big
Lie trial balloons. Remember the prominent Republicans who lied that the 9-11
terrorist attack DID NOT happen during the Bush administration? They were Dana
Perino, Mary Matalin, Todd Harris and Rudy Giuliani. That’s not a coincidence.
That’s enemy action. And they did that unchallenged on the so-called “liberal media.”
Wednesday, August 16, 2017
Why Republicans Demonize Antifascists
For almost 20 years now, I have
identified my politics as “antifascist.” Given the enormity of historic evil
that has resulted from fascism, that ought to be a noncontroversial position.
Any sane, decent human being should be antifascist.
But the Republicans have decided
to do to the term “antifascist” what they previously did to the terms “liberal,”
“entitlement,” “social justice warrior” and “politically correct.” Republican
propagandists like Frank Luntz and Karl Rove successfully demonized those terms
through their minions at Fox News and elsewhere. Their intent was to discredit
the very concepts of compassionate politics, earned government benefits, people
who fight for the rights of others and politeness.
The GOP is on a constant
propaganda mission to redefine language and make the better appear the worse.
As Jeffrey Martini observed, science and education are now described as
“liberal scams.”
Tuesday, August 15, 2017
The Guide to the Good Should Be Within
Developmental psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. |
“In the esoteric traditions, codes
of morality are less important for the simple reason that the ultimate purpose of
the spiritual effort if to attain a level of personal development at which
morality is natural,” Walt Anderson wrote in Open Secrets: A Western Guide to Tibetan Buddhism.
“It is
discovered within oneself, and external authority is no longer necessary or
meaningful. This principle is not foreign to western psychology. Lawrence
Kohlberg theorized that the most highly developed human beings operate out of
inner moral principle. The same point is made by Abraham Maslow in his studies
of healthy, ‘self-actualizing’ people who, he says, have relatively little
respect for the formal rules and regulations of the society but at the same
time a strong sense of concern for others.”
Saturday, August 12, 2017
And What Rough Beast, Its Hour Come Round at Last...
My friend Dan said, “A racist in a
sports car runs over a crowd of counter-protesters. His act was instigated by
his anger over state officials having removed a statue of Robert E. Lee, a
symbol of oppression and bigotry that was erroneously sanctioned by the State
of Virginia. The state’s decision to remove it addresses one simple question:
Why should African Americans pay taxes to support erecting a statue of a man
whom had he won, would have kept them in bondage? They shouldn’t, thus the
removal was the right thing to do, so don’t give me that bullshit Lee is just
part of their history or heritage. For in this case, as James Joyce put it,
‘History is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake.’”
Matt Mattingly, Joseph Bryan Judd
and I were just in Joe’s book store wondering when the Virginia racists would
start killing people. But we were behind the times. They already had.
This was fascist murder, coldly
planned and executed, to protect the symbol of a state that fought for human
slavery.
Let’s remember, there’s only one
side that's wrong here. Utterly, historically wrong. And — for anyone who can’t
add two and two, and lacks all moral sense — that would be the side fighting to
protect a memorial celebrating a rebel slave state. Don’t let anyone try to
“both sides” their way out of this horror.
I'm looking forward to the
holidays this year. I want to greet the people who tried to lecture me last
year on what a great president Trump would make. Always presuming we survive to
the holidays, of course.
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Just Don't Pretend to Be Surprised
If we survive the current North
Korean situation without nuclear war, it will be in spite of Trump, not because
of him. Not a terribly encouraging fact to ponder.
But I kind of ran through all my
emotional reactions to this nine months ago, when Trump was elected. That’s
when the American nuclear nightmare became inevitable, and haunted me. After
all, Trump had already repeatedly expressed his puerile, criminally
irresponsible desire to use nuclear weapons in war.
How bizarre it must be to be
someone who cannot foresee simple, inevitable, logical consequences.
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
Monday, August 7, 2017
Finally, a Film Worthy of Godzilla's Stature
The 2016 Toho film Shin Godzilla is about an inept
bureaucratic response to the monster's arrival in Tokyo. That alone makes it
one of the rare Godzilla movies that offers an actual interesting story in
which humans play a real role in the drama.
Shin Godzilla is excellent, a social and political satire wrapped neatly
and adroitly in a giant monster movie. It’s wryly observant about the way
bureaucratic confusion, ego-stroking and timidity generally fk things up. The
politicians matter-of-factly regard the disaster as secondary to their
political ambitions. Boy, is that true to life.
The film is really quite smart,
and holds together thematically in a way most Godzilla movies don’t.
The appearance of Godzilla’s
nuclear breath is deliberately delayed, and incredibly dramatic and formidable
when it’s finally used.
For my money, this is the best
Godzilla movie since the first, and my friend Nicholas Swaim may have answered
the question of why that is. “It’s a comment on the 2011 tsunami/meltdown in
Japan, much like how the first film is on the atomic bombings and Lucky Dragon
irradiation,” he observed.
Friday, August 4, 2017
At Dawn With the Dog on Democratic Streets
Every morning at dawn, George
Hilton Beagle and I take a dawn walk through a public park and on open,
connected streets past beautiful old houses, the kind built before the
cowering, furtive cul-de-sacs and ruling-class “gated communities” became
fashionable. You know, back before all the Republicans started sneering at the
very word “democracy.”
This is one of the houses George
and I pass every day, the historic Thomas Marshall house at 218 Jackson St.,
Charleston, IL. Abraham
Lincoln stayed there when practicing here as a lawyer and during the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Beware the Grammar Rouge
Being clear and accurate in 21st
century America gets you branded as an “elitist.”
Cory Thomas Blake said: “You are considered politically
correct if you know proper syntax, tense, grammar & spelling.
Eric Severson replied: “It’s funny
how that is considered p.c. but one can also be called a Grammar Nazi for
following these conventions. You’d think modern-day Nazis would be more
fastidious about grammar than they are.”
Blake said, “Maybe we can give them
a new title — Grammar Rouge instead of Khymer Rouge, or something. They were
anti-education, illiterate idiots, too.”
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Saturday, July 22, 2017
The Day Britain Never Surrendered
Christopher Nolan's 2017 film "Dunkirk" |
While I was watching Dunkirk with Anthony, Paul, Matt, Bart and Jeff, the word that kept
coming to mind was “tight.”
Director Christopher Nolan focuses tightly on the
common-man Brits trapped and struggling in this World War II drama, putting you
right INTO the cockpit of the Spitty,
below decks on the sinking ship and aboard the small civilian craft crossing
the English Channel to save the trapped troops. The storytelling is also tight,
beginning at almost the end of the story with the despairing, defeated soldiers
being machine-gunned and bombed, moving with unrelenting suspense for a brisk
107 minutes.
By the end of the eighth day, 338,226 soldiers had
been rescued by a quickly assembled fleet of over 800 boats, many of them Thames
vessels, car ferries, pleasure craft, speedboats and other small civilian boats.
This film’s tight focus puts that extraordinary historic effort into personal,
human terms while never stinting on the adventure.