Here I am with two of my favorite Eastern Illinois University journalism students, Jackson Mortka and Brad Kupiec |
Pages
▼
Monday, November 27, 2017
When I Taught Journalism...
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Sunday, November 12, 2017
The Gay Life of Sherlock Holmes
Colin Blakely as John Watson and Robert Stephens as Sherlock Holmes in Billy Wilder's film |
Concerning on the commercial
failure of his 1970 film The Private Life
of Sherlock Holmes, director Billy Wilder said, “I should have been more
daring. I wanted to make Holmes a homosexual … That’s why he’s on dope, you
know.”
I first saw it at a drive-in in
1970. It was hard to find. And it was always pretty clear to me from the
finished film that Wilder DID make Holmes gay. Despite all the romantic stuff
with the beautiful German spy at the end of the film, its most sadly touching
moment comes earlier, when Holmes refuses to deny to Watson that he is
homosexual.
The doggedly heterosexual, brainy,
manic Wilder loved Holmes, and had wanted to make a film about him for his
entire career. But perhaps audiences were not ready, in 1970, to see a film in
which the Great Detective is both taken seriously and finally defeated.
“Holmes appeals to Wilder for his
human failings more than for his legendary qualities as a detective — The Private Life depicts a crushing
humiliation which Dr. Watson has suppressed from public knowledge,” Joseph
McBride and Michael Wilmington wrote in Film
Quarterly. “But Wilder’s tone is unusually subdued, even elegiac, perhaps
because the film is set in a simpler, more gentlemanly era far from the
barbarism of James Bond and Pussy Galore.”
I’d be fascinated to see the
three-and-a-half-hour Private Life that
Wilder originally prepared, but wasn’t permitted to release. I always have the
nagging sense that even Wilder’s failed concepts were just slightly ahead of
their time. The possibility that Holmes and Watson might be gay finally became
a mere running joke in the BCC’s Sherlock.
Elementary, Wilder would’ve said.
Sunday, November 5, 2017
Thor Ragnarok: Blood and Thunder and Fun
Paul, Matt, Jake and I saw Thor:
Ragnarok Saturday afternoon. Lighthearted fare that builds seamlessly to
blood-and-thunder, summon-my-power melodrama. In other words, a perfectly
satisfying comic book movie.
Cate Blanchette tackles the
potentially tedious role of a death god with wry assurance peppered by
convincing menace. Chris Hemsworth is as boldly charming as ever, even being
put through some rough paces here.
Now, having so many characters to
play around with after 17 Marvel superhero movies, it’s all like a delightful
game with lots of surprising and fun playing pieces.
I do have to say that they pitched
Jane Foster overboard like trash in this movie. Not that they ever really
achieved that Richard Donner Superman/Lois thing they were going for in that
relationship anyway. I think Natalie Portman was the problem. They needed
someone who would sell it the way Margot Kidder did. Kidder said that what
Donner wanted of her was to be able to convincingly look gah-gah over Superman.
The first Thor movie ends on a
wonderfully romantic note that would have been perfect had you believed the
relationship.
Saturday, November 4, 2017
Reading and Plotting and Writing
My favorite books as a teenager
included Plotting and Writing Suspense
Fiction by Patricia Highsmith. The canny creator of The Talented Mr. Ripley wrote a book that is equal parts
inspirational, autobiographical and advisory.
I read an Effingham library copy
when I was in high school and it took me decades to find a hardcover copy of my
own. She made me want to be a professional writer.
Other favorites included The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. I have since
escaped their dark, Neptune-like gravitational pull, but I will never forget
them. Rand’s philosophy offers useful hymns to individualism — particularly for
the young, when they most need to hear them. But unfortunately, despite her
self-congratulatory trumpeting of reason, Rand confused her own whims and
passions with facts, much to the detriment of the political economy and moral
bearings of the U.S., as it turned out.
Then there was Live and Let Die by Ian Fleming. The
second of the James Bond novels remains the most vivid in my mind, with its
evocation of New York circa 1953, with its tough heroic action, with its
vulnerable, clairvoyant heroine, with its Freudian-daddy villain’s horrifying
schemes of vengeance, with its lyric Silver Meteor train ride from Manhattan to
St. Petersburg and those offhanded observations of Bond’s that seemed to
express the height of sophistication when you were a teenage boy.
The problem isn’t getting the
caviar you want, you know. It’s getting the proper amount of buttered toast to
spread it on.
Ian Fleming took an eager
sensual pleasure in life that ended his life early, but that can still sweep us
along with its zest. The real Bond — as real as any Bond can be — is there, in
Fleming’s novels.